Wisdom Teachings: [#45] The Layers of Time Video
[#45] The Layers of Time
Next up...

Sign Up NowWatch the full video - and many others - now with your Gaiam TV subscription!

Wisdom Teachings: [#45] The Layers of Time (January 2014)

Season 6, Episode 7
Available worldwide

Except for this exact moment, all of the past and the future exist in probable states. The choices we make not only create our future, but can retroactively recreate the past. This phenomenon is known as layered time and is a direct result of the geometric oneness of the universe. David Wilcock explains how we can use extraterrestrial science revealed in the 1950’s to consciously and intentionally affect the layers of time in this presentation originally webcast January 20, 2014.

David Wilcock


[#1] Introduction to Source Field - Part 1  Video
Season 1, Episode 1 [#1] Introduction to Source Field - Part 1
[#1] Introduction to Source Field - Part 1 (April 2013)
Season 1, Episode 1
, 30 minutes
In this inaugural episode, David Wilcock connects science and ancient teachings to explain how to be in oneness with living universe and our connection with the source field. Discover how you can manifest the wisdom of these ...
Available worldwide
[#2] Introduction to Source Field - Part 2  Video
Season 1, Episode 2 [#2] Introduction to Source Field - Part 2
[#2] Introduction to Source Field - Part 2 (April 2013)
Season 1, Episode 2
, 30 minutes
Continuing the discussion of the source field, David Wilcock explains how the biological universe is influencing you via the connection of non-local minds and the Law of One. Learn how you can become a one with the universal ...
Available worldwide
[#3] Beyond Cosmic Consciousness - Part 1  Video
Season 1, Episode 3 [#3] Beyond Cosmic Consciousness - Part 1
[#3] Beyond Cosmic Consciousness - Part 1 (April 2013)
Season 1, Episode 3
, 31 minutes
David Wilcock explains how to connect with the galactic center in order to boost your psychic abilities, the positive impact of the meditation effect upon the world, and how light affects DNA. Discover how you can begin to ...
Available worldwide
[#4] Beyond Cosmic Consciousness - Part 2  Video
Season 1, Episode 4 [#4] Beyond Cosmic Consciousness - Part 2
[#4] Beyond Cosmic Consciousness - Part 2 (April 2013)
Season 1, Episode 4
, 30 minutes
We have previously learned the positive effect that light has on DNA. That concept is further explored as David Wilcock reveals the energetic secrets of the DNA molecule. Discover how your DNA is written into the background of ...
Available worldwide

People who watched this also watched

Join the Conversation

Login or sign upsign up to add a comment

heartinmotion888, posted on August 21, 2016

As an artist, I was once told by my teacher at the HONOLULU ACADEMY OF ARTS..Wilson Stamper...: "if you find a master artist..you like...copy his painting and you will experience ~~" At any rate. I learned to connect to the spirit of the Dutch Masters...and created my first "classical realism." painting...It is very much like going back in time...and or making connection telepathically with the masters....also learn to connect to the ancient MASTERS of the FAR EAST and learning what it takes to experience "SPONTANEOUS" healing as they demonstrated ...perhaps it is much like traveling through space and time...reversing the to the time of returning to those days where the MASTERS practiced these SO CALLED MIRACLES as a way of life...as it is written in the series of books by Baird Spaulding, the Teachings of the MASTERS of the FAR EAST, This series of Wisdom TEACHINGS by DAVID has been the best !!!!!!

heartinmotion888, posted on August 21, 2016

this is interesting...as the cosmic law states that whatever mankind has done in the past...has the opportunity to bring it back to balance.
ATLANTIS self destruction of over using technology...?? Today we have the opportunity to use the technology...for the good of all humanity~~~
(I have often thought about this) There were also a whole universe created that self destructed...and here we are again to have a multi dimensional
experience...to use the technology for the good of all....it really is a conscious choice...

be_lash1016, posted on June 23, 2016

Seeing a lot of blue spheres in shows by David Wilcock and William Henry here on Gaia, also remember Corey Goode talking about his encounters. Starting to freak out just a little bit.

olysback, posted on October 23, 2015

allenteressa, posted on September 26, 2015

What a wonderful lecturer you are. Every teacher and instructor needs to have your enthusiasm. It's just fun!

zentzel, posted on August 17, 2015

I'm with you David. Yes, the movie industry need to make more interesting movies and omit the horror plots. To me, those movies are ridiculous. It would be nicer to see more happy or positive interesting sci-fi movies.

mbowman0820, posted on July 26, 2015

Only david can make up his own words.

c.rensink, posted on May 18, 2015

I'm impressed of your work. I've watched your show for two weeks now; from the beginning upto season 2 episode 10.
I'm wondering: did you have had contact with dr. Penrose about your findings?
A fan from the Netherlands, Chris Rensink

bylandwendy, posted on March 16, 2014

David, I am so enjoying your series and must say that I am learning a lot. I also love your sense of humor.

gbbrinck, posted on February 28, 2014

"retrocognize"? Would that work? :P


Looking at the positive grassmanian, I noticed it was portayed in color. I seem to like this concept, however, is the "white side" the emanation point? Is there an emanation point?

These theories seem to be combatting the conventions very well. I appreciate it and was wondering if someone could answer a question. I am onboard as so far as the merkaba, or amplituhedron(it seems), solve the Feynman diagrams. I have trouble wrapping my head around time. I understand that all in ONE and NOW, seemingly. But, does "each mind" have a central resonance, and/or(i think yes), can one mind "tap into" the central emanation, or sound(as it seems), and dilate or transcribe itself/communicate/experience other domains? i.e.-telepathy. This all seems so obvious, but I am looking forward to more science and the practical applications of this knowledge.

Also, confused at how this "new geometry" has corners..(what is the medium? is 'this' what we're calling Source Field?) I am proponent of the primordial ohm theory, as well as one as a 0 rather than one as a line. i.e.-1. Any thoughts?

Anyone interested, check out the BEM(Breakthrough Energy Movement) Conference. Wonderful links on thrivemovement.com. Not sure where else to see it. Excited for BEM 2014 March 30-31 in Hong Kong, China!



karinamel789, posted on February 13, 2014

So are the ETs from other densities?

marktbasham, posted on February 12, 2014

 open letter
Dear Eugene Khutoyansky , Jacob Bourjaily and the rest of the physics community
RE: Can the Amplituhedron Make Chocolate Taste Better?
This is going to sound a little crazy but I am going to be brave and not filter it. At the least it will give you something to laugh at during lunch. I have been working on a book project that started as a paper entitled Hyper Dimensional Polyhedral fluid Dynamics the Geometric Solution to Unified field Theory. The weird part is that I am a cabinet maker with no math background. I have had a number of experiences outside of space–time since I was young, and ran into some cool dudes local and non-local that helped me understand some stuff. More heart centered than brain centered. I was developing a model of reality to help my rational mind keep up. It is a holographic web of polyhedral flux lines emerging from fractaly nested relative singularities. The flux lines can vibrate with a maximum amplitude described by the overlap of nested spheres who’s surfaces intersect the centers of neighboring spheres. The flux lines have harmonic structure apparently interacting with spherical waves on a surface boundarys of the singularities at the nodal points of the resulting tetrahedral grid. This is just a static model I was playing with and has fractal and perhaps holographic properties. At some point I thought that it would take on this appearance only to a consciousness that is embedded in the space-time currents produced by standing waves in the in the electro gravitic cross talk between the singularities embedded in the fractal structure , as in living on a planet for instance. All motion is relative and we are not experiencing what could be called true vectors, if there is such a thing. I stared considering the spin factors of nested spheres of influence i.e. Quantum, sub atomic, atomic, molecular, biological, planetary, Galactic, Etc. Along the way I discovered the octahedral voids at the super cluster level that have billion light year edges. Which nest with tetrahedral geometry quite well and have specific relationships to the rest of the platonic solids for that matter. Ending with the dodecahedral shape of the universe at thirty billion plus light years. From the view within the structure there is infinite microcosmic and infinite macrocosmic potential. This seams to have been explored in a paper published by Nassim Haramein on the The Schwartzschild Proton published in the American institute of Physics magazine. Nassim addresses schwarwtzchild protons as mini blacks holes that communicate instantaneously with other “particles” through quantum entanglement. This paper eliminates the need for a strong and week force and leaves us with gravity and electromagnetism i.e. The simultaneous in breath and out breath of the singularities.
I thought of two people playing ping-pong on the equator with the table aligned north to south, the white ball going back and forth. I added Earths rotational speed (as an image not as a calculation) to see the ball take on a waveform with anamplitude roughly the table length, and a frequency, of the thousand +- MPH divided by the ping –pong sound. This wave form gets more complex when I add the earths orbit which itself is spiral and not flat as the planets chase the sun, which also has multiple factors of spin etc. etc. in the galaxy which is hanging out with other galaxies clustered around the aforementioned octahedral voids in the dodecahedral universe.
I ended up thinking of a grand sphere with a surface made of waveforms, nothing else. Just complex braided spirals wrapping around an empty ball. Absolute unexplored microcosmic potential inside and absolute macrocosmic potential outside. I thought that there might be a way to mathematically translate the fractal -holographic version to the spherical version by removing any dependence on local space time references. By not fixating on constants.
It appears that the Amplituhedron is tetrahedral geometry in n-space and I believe from watching Nima’s lecture at the ICIP SUSY 2013 that it has the capability of being fractal and self similar. Several questions arise.
Does this fractal version if I am interpreting this thing at all correctly, mathamaticaly translate to the infinite spherical version?
Do you perceive the Amplituhedrn as a mental construct for doing mathematical computations? Or do you believe this might describe in some way, actual waveform in the zero point field for instance. Could the billion light year edges of the octahedrons in our Virgo cluster be considered part of this field? If these octahedral super clusters are part of a dodecahedral universe, could we consider them the internal dynamics of a particle, namely the universe. After all when we get rid of time, what’s 13.8 billion years. Our universe came out of the vacuum just like all the other “particles”. Could the aforementioned grand sphere be home to our universe? Are we part of the sea foam near the surface maybe? Does this sphere become more complex by feeding on the unmanifest infinite potential and bringing it into the matrix of finite form? Maybe a smart dude already thought of this. Let me check. I love Google.
... for they [the Pythagoreans] plainly say that when the one had been constructed, whether out of planes or of surface or of seed or of elements which they cannot express, immediately the nearest part of the unlimited began to be drawn in and limited by the limit. The Pythagoreans, too, held that void exists, and that it enters the heaven from the unlimited breath – it, so to speak, breathes in void. The void distinguishes the natures of things, since it is the thing that separates and distinguishes the successive terms in a series. This happens in the first case of numbers; for the void distinguishes their nature. Thanks Wikipedia,
So the story goes. The Pythagorean community apparently had a split at some point where Hippasus, the guy who allegedly created irrational numbers, put a more mathematical spin on things and didn’t grove so much with the cosmology and philosophical stuff. Hippasus supposedly was drowned at sea because he revealed how to construct a dodecahedron inside a sphere. I wonder why that is so important. Anyway the infinite Void is not portioned off in any haphazard way. It must follow laws of harmony. Harmony could theoreticaly exist without counsousness , where beauty implies an observer. We are all made of these harmonic relationsips. Counsouseness is implied by the fact that you are reading this. So we have harmony in the structure, Beauty in the observation of it. What is the endless see of void standing by to take up the negative “space” in the structure. We call it LOVE. It can only come in by an act of consciously creating new possibilities in the structure.
The issue is that we are all one and don’t know it. So out in this illusionary synthetic world of distinctions we suffer from separation anxiety and long for the oneness. We love the stuff “here” however, and completely merging into the oneness we would loose our toys. Not to mention our egoic minds. This could be called fear of intimacy. The game with toys and egos is shifting in a new current. Surrendering to the current we can only loose what we never really had. We gain that which we have always been but forgot about. Our true selves. The only way to get to the deep chocolate at the bottom of a latte is to drink the foam. A conscious act in the now. The enjoyment comes from being present for each of our conscious acts one breath at a time. Am I saying anything intelligible here or am I some old guy who should have stayed in school. I don’t think any of us realize the implications of your discoveries yet,
THANK YOU! I love you guys.
Mark Basham

I hope you have a nice lunch.

PS Here is an oil painting of one of my adventures outside ordinary space-time. sorry it won't fit in this box

sahir.twinturbo, posted on January 31, 2014


brandi.l.eckert, posted on January 26, 2014

BRAVO!! Bravo, David - This series is destined to be the building blocks for future generations to grasp the basics of where and how we began to AWAKEN! Thank you, so very much. I can't even imagine what pushing these boundaries has meant for you in your everyday life experiences, but you have support standing behind you, in awe as we all learn more and more. You are leaving a legacy of greatness - I hope that you are able to enjoy that knowing HERE and NOW. Just - BRAVO!

impossiblebutterfly, posted on January 25, 2014

time to start from the beginning and watch again!

betsyaida, posted on January 23, 2014

David Huge fan of your work. I started with your website 3 years ago, sourcefield investigations, the synchronicity key and now gaiamtv and of course I will be seeing you again for the 2nd time at New Living Expo in SF. My question below is probably completely off topic with your most recent episode because I am only on episode #24, working on catching up, but this question has been driving me crazy since I learned about the mars-one.com mission to mars in 2011. You are the only person I have wanted to ask this question to....

Since 1993 after reading the Seth Materials I received info that Mars would be the next disclosed human settlement but that it would not be available to your average person. Mars-one.com is establishing a permanent human settlement and will send it's first "hand picked" astronauts in 2024. My question is.....> Is this a cover up for the fact that Mars has already been occupied by humans? I do believe I remember you saying that your insiders have said their are portals that have been taking people to Mars and back to earth to work with other human extraterrestrials underground and that it has been happening for a very long time. I believe Duncan, from the Montauk project, was one of the folks that talked about this.

At any rate below is from their website:

Mars One is a not-for-profit foundation that will establish a permanent human settlement on Mars. Human settlement on Mars is possible today with existing technologies. Mars One mission plan integrates components that are well tested and readily available from industry leaders worldwide. The first footprint on Mars and lives of the crew thereon will captivate and inspire generations; it is this public interest that will help finance this human mission to Mars.

The Mars One mission plan consists of cargo missions and unmanned preparation of a habitable settlement, followed by human landings. In the coming years, a demonstration mission, communication satellites, two rovers and several cargo missions will be sent to Mars. These missions will set up the outpost where the human crew will live and work.

The mission design takes into account the expansion of the human colony where a new crew arrive every two years. Mars One will select and train the human crew for permanent settlement. The search for Astronauts began in April 2013. More than 78,000 registered for the selection program within two weeks of its launch.

This link will take you to their timeline as to when everything takes place: http://www.mars-one.com/mission/roadmap

tom1, posted on January 23, 2014

Seeing through layers of time is what I teach

Love this video - see this one too


lindaedwards888, posted on January 23, 2014

I think the word you may have been looking for is backward causality. I have read about it from my Bible teacher.
Love your program and I appreciate you so much for what you are teaching us. It ALL makes sense to me!!!

taoss, posted on January 23, 2014

This is an added note. Please watch this presentation on Sound by Michael Tellinger at the Breakthrough Conference 2013. This work ties in with what David is teaching in these episodes.


Phyllisa, posted on January 23, 2014

Wisdom Teachings is the friggin best! Thank God for this information coming to light! (like dbiggs says below.) For me normal culture's 'reality' is so lame and unfulfilling. I've always had a hunch that there was more... thanks so much for this validation! This is paradigm blasting stuff... now I'm able to continue on in this human situation more tolerably! haha :)
-Natalie Noseworthy ♬
Incidentally I have the word "alien" in my name: Nat alieN oseworthy. It's a sign!
PS Thankfully my folks Patrick and Phyllisa got me on to watching Gaiam!

dbiggs64, posted on January 22, 2014

Thank you so much David for brining this information to light. I just wish each episode was longer.

Mind-Body-Spirit, posted on January 21, 2014

Hello! I am finding this series so fantastic and like others I'm grateful and I salute you David for your care and courage. And, am asking for more of the same in addressing what a few commenters have identified as a discrepancy. Synchronistically, this morning looking at the traffic light I was thinking of trying my hand at making a merkaba out of bristol board.
You must admit the drawings you have shown are inadequate. Could you please have someone make a physical shape you could show us in an episode? And if perchance you have made a mistake in visualizing the 3-D shape, it would be fascinating to find out how the shapes differ. Or maybe you are bang on and your detractors are off. It does seem worth addressing though. Cheers!

we44, posted on January 21, 2014

Hi David, I have been following your work for several years and am interested in your thoughts around reconciling the metaphysics of the Law of One and A Course in Miracles. Dr. William Evans

Paliana7, posted on January 22, 2014

A Course in Miracles makes clear that this projected reality is the result of the "dream of separation." The nature of the true reality (God's Reality) is described in the course as an extension or expansion (NOT a projection. That all of what you David along with cutting edge discoveries fits with the projected reality description, leaves one wondering if we are not just exploring, discovering and verifying aspects of a "dream" reality. Waking up in the dream implies, and the Course supports, that being the way out of the projection.

So I appreciated Dr. Evans' inquiry.
Pali Summerlin

taoss, posted on January 21, 2014

I like the idea of changing the past by what is done in the now. All the more reason for clarity of thought in the now that people of today are performing. A tough call for anyone who is still submerged in the system.


m.lynwalters, posted on January 21, 2014

I love how all this is coming together! To think I was born in 1961, just when the lecture you reference was being given, only to come across it now. Wow. How fun and really moving.

shakka_z, posted on January 21, 2014

GaiamTV as a great source of information for mind expansion explorers. And now is the time to go to next level and help individuals break isolation. We need to give them a place to express themselves among other open minded seekers.

I strongly suggest the creation of a GAIAM forum web site.

All comments are spread and duplicated across each episode and each film in the vast Gaiam's library. I think It would be much constructive to facilitate the exchange of ideas between members of the gaiamtv community and also the many guests and show hosts.

Am I the only one thinking about it?


jasummers, posted on January 20, 2014

Where is HIS WORK? "Black Whole Universe"... ??
Good work increasing the reference to the thesis! Please continue to reference! It provides the frame work of the whole and how each piece of information fits into that, thus increase the understanding/ evidence/ truth of your Theories (Law Of One).
Subjectively speaking-Book of Revelations crazy? Agree or disagree... if this information is to be an archive;
please consider the ramifications of separation that may come when speaking against ones faith.
Thank you For receiving input! it is validating

ALANB, posted on January 20, 2014

David, you have several times stated that 4 Amplituhedrons will fit within a Merkaba. I would like some clarification. My understanding is that the Amplituhedron AKA Positive Grassmannian is a very complex geometric form. A Merkaba on the other hand can be visualized as an Octahedron at the core with a Tetrahedron attached to each of its 8 faces. So you have a total of 8 Tetrahedrons and 1 Octahedron, which cannot be divided evenly into smaller Tetrahedrons. How do the Amplituhedrons fit within the Merkaba?

frankensign, posted on February 9, 2014


This video shows 3-D models of both the Star Tetrahedron and the newly discovered Amplituhedron and shows that the Amplituhedron is NOT in fact a part of the Star Tetrahedron as some may believe. David needs to correct this.

ghaashome, posted on January 21, 2014

Ditto AlanB,

I've been following David Wilcock for a very long time. I've watch his videos, bought his books, hoping he is sincere and not selling snake oil.

I got excited to get on Google SketchUp and draw this 3d amplituhedron, which Mr. Wilcock says is made up of 4 tetrahedrons and is "perfectly" 1/4 of a merkaba (a stellated octahedron).

Not so. As AlanB points out, the shapes David claims fit perfectly together do not. How basic is this error that claims to be the basis of our universe, consciousness, existence?

Has Mr. Wilcock studied the shape he claims out smarts Einstein and answers all the fundamental questions about space, time and our universe? This is misinformation that discredits gaiam tv.

Unfortunately, those who aren't very skilled at creating 3d models are being sold a bill of goods with extra extraordinary claims attached.

Either Mr. Wilcock corrects this misinfo, or subscribing to gaiam tv, I'm afraid is where fools dare to tread. Beware.

frankensign, posted on February 9, 2014

ghaashome, thanks for your comment but I don't think David is aware that the amlituhedron doesn't fit within a star tetrahedron. Why would he misinform about something when he seems to care so much about the merits of what he says based on science and data to back up his claims. I just don't think he has researched this particular bit of evidence. I sent him the video posted above. Let's hope he watches it and corrects his mistake.

bevbrodsky, posted on January 20, 2014

Thank you for another fantastic episode!

Eljaytee333, posted on January 20, 2014

Thank You for such power packed episode. There are Parallel Timelines/Universes. I'm sure most people might not realize that they have experienced them....but, where did those people who wrote the movies get their ideas? Part of the 'Beyond' is utilizing the technology of the Universe at a conscious level. I would love to have in depth discussions with those ETs. Does anyone remember the Australian-Polish 1995 TV Series 'Spellbinders'? Like time travel by stepping thru a vortex.

Michael Stangl, posted on January 20, 2014

Fantastic show! Each show deepens/opens my awareness. Thank you!

tilldi, posted on January 20, 2014

David you are truly magnificent! Not only have you been able to put all this together,
but you are able to explain it so well (and in such a crushingly short amount of time).
I have no doubt that you have already made your own history in close to 100% of the
timelines as one of the greatest teachers of all time.
Eternal love and gratitude, David. (posting at 4:33)

Love & Light,

austinhollway, posted on January 20, 2014

words cant describe how greatful I am to you. I just want to know everything you know lol plzzz ill do anything

Brenbesser, posted on January 20, 2014


The Google found this link above when I searched for "cern scientists break speed of light."

Apparently, they now think the results were caused by a faulty cable.

There is plenty of other evidence to support David's premiss for time travel, but the 2011 article he mentions may no longer be a good reference.

Rjhind1st, posted on January 20, 2014

I enjoy your teaching !! Your show should be 1 hour !! 30 min is not enough time !! Please !!l

Jimirod, posted on January 20, 2014

I'd like to think I could re-cognate the past from my point of view, but then, I would be the only one to appreciate it in my biological time line of existence. I'm sure my conscienceless (the gravity we live in) is my only record of now. Your now will have different memories but since we are all connect at the spiritual level your reality can be in my dreams and my biological entity will ride the current wave of amplituhedrons in the now.

More From Gaia

Password is case sensitive.