Open Minds: Dr. Judy Wood on The Truth about 9/11 Video
Dr. Judy Wood on The Truth about 9/11
Next up...

Sign Up NowWatch the full video - and many others - now with your Gaiam TV subscription!

Open Minds: Dr. Judy Wood on The Truth about 9/11 (September 2012)

Season 1, Episode 10
Available worldwide

Did the planes crashing into the Twin Towers hide the use of Direct Energy Weapons? Dr. Judy Wood, a former professor of mechanical engineering, discussed the anomalies that point to this conclusion during a lively conversation with Regina Meredith, originally webcast on September 11, 2012, the anniversary of the terrorist plot.

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. In the time since 9/11/01, Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11.

Regina Meredith
Judy Wood


Michael Tellinger on Secrets of Lost Civilizations Video
Season 1, Episode 1 Michael Tellinger on Secrets of Lost Civilizations
Michael Tellinger on Secrets of Lost Civilizations (July 2012)
Season 1, Episode 1
, 58 minutes
Michael Tellinger, author, scientist, explorer, has become a real-life Indiana Jones, making groundbreaking discoveries about ancient vanished civilizations at the southern tip of Africa.
Available worldwide
Paul Von Ward on the Secrets of the Cosmos Video
Season 1, Episode 2 Paul Von Ward on the Secrets of the Cosmos
Paul Von Ward on the Secrets of the Cosmos (July 2012)
Season 1, Episode 2
, 57 minutes
Paul Von Ward is an author, scholar and interdisciplinary cosmologist. He believes a cosmology based only on a single discipline omits many areas of the human experience of the universe.
Available worldwide
Richard Dolan on UFO Cover-Ups Video
Season 1, Episode 3 Richard Dolan on UFO Cover-Ups
Richard Dolan on UFO Cover-Ups (July 2012)
Season 1, Episode 3
, 58 minutes
Is our government hiding real-life X-Files? UFO historian Richard Dolan is considered an expert in these government conspiracies.
Available worldwide
Jon Rappoport on Pharmaceutical Fraud Video
Season 1, Episode 4 Jon Rappoport on Pharmaceutical Fraud
Jon Rappoport on Pharmaceutical Fraud (July 2012)
Season 1, Episode 4
, 60 minutes
Is the pharmaceutical industry endangering our health for the sake of profits?
Available worldwide

People who watched this also watched

Join the Conversation

Login or sign upsign up to add a comment

mufc1956, posted on June 29, 2016

lmtonjessup, posted on May 23, 2016

Dr. Wood has been careful to present the scientific evidence and not to suppose beyond it. If a DEW was used, by who and why are two obvious questions. I would like to think our government assessed the possible fallout and destruction field of the twin towers after the planes hit and chose a route of containment. By "dustifying" the buildings they minimized the possibility of further destruction to Manhattan. Seismic activity, for example, could have caused a chain reaction of destruction throughout the entire island and surrounding areas. I am choosing to put my faith in such a scenario. I do not want to believe our country would use a DEW against our own people. Thank you for a great presentation.

eairthyone, posted on May 9, 2016

Dr. Wood doesn't have anything to gain by presenting the evidence to us clearly. She is not afraid to stand alone and point out what should have been obviousto the rest of us from the beginning - that the media and who ever elsewas behind the events on 9/11 played us like a cheap fiddle. She doesn't point fingers. She just lays it all out there. I admire her bravery and her willingness to stand by the truth. - See more at:

malcolmscottmail, posted on February 21, 2015

Some have suggested that much of the structural steel of the World Trade Center skyscrapers was turned to dust, or "dustified" – a term used by Judy Wood, the primary proponent of this hypothesis – with some type of directed energy weapon (DEW). Some of the observations cited by Wood include the voluminous dust created during the Twin Towers' destruction, the "craters" in WTC 5 and 6, "toasted" cars, and small holes in glass windows.

While Wood and AE911truth agree that the official story of an "inevitable" collapse by gravity alone is impossible because it conflicts with laws of physics, we completely differ on the mechanism of the destruction. Crucially, once there is proof and consensus that the official story violates elementary laws of physics, our major scientific task has been accomplished. The remaining task is the political challenge of mobilizing support for a legitimate investigation.

Of course, the science of the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7 can be advanced beyond the mere conclusion that the official story must be false, but it is imperative that anyone seriously advancing understanding of the mechanisms of collapse hew closely to scientific methodology. This is crucial to earn the 9/11 Truth Movement the public respect it deserves, rather than to cast it into the role of perpetrating "junk science."

The scientific method requires us to look at all the available evidence and then assess various explanations for their ability to account for the evidence. At some point, just as in pure science, the inferior explanations must be discarded if there is to be continued progress in an investigation. It is our opinion that the DEW hypothesis is not just weak; it is not supported by the evidence at all. We provide only a general discussion here, referring the reader to references for a thorough understanding.

A Hypothesis in Search of Facts

One of the observations that seems to have motivated Wood to come up with her directed energy weapon hypothesis is that the debris pile at Ground Zero does not seem to be tall enough to contain enough steel to equal what was in the Twin Towers before they came down. She departs from verifiable fact quite early with this claim. FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, performed the first technical review of what brought down the Twin Towers and WTC 7. Even in its report, FEMA acknowledges (inconveniently for the official story, which cannot account for this fine destruction of the Twin Towers) that roughly 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints. Indeed, the entire plaza was covered with steel pieces and assemblies. Some of the structural steel was thrown as far away as the Winter Gardens – 600 feet.

Given all this, there is no reason to expect a taller debris pile at Ground Zero than the photographs show. Wood's belief that some of the steel must have been turned into dust rests on a completely spurious interpretation of the visual evidence. Her hypothesis is an attempt to solve a nonexistent problem. As we will show, it can be sustained only by additional poor analysis and leaps of faith, just as in the official explanation.

catherinejsidoti, posted on January 26, 2015

I too have felt that too many people have talked about the events of 9/11. Living in New York and speaking to many people who have had loved ones spoke about them as missing and nowhere to be found, not even body parts is horrifying. I was stuck in Chicago and when I came back to New York, Manhattan was so ravaged that it smelled like a war zone. Is Dr. Judy Wood on to something, I do think so, if free energy was used to bring the towers down, then whoever gave the order to do so knew that it was done to prevent the towers from collapsing horizontally as it would have devastated most of Manhattan and more people and more of the structures in New York. To stand alone is to stand in truth sometimes, it can be a lonely place however it can be a peaceful righteous place to also stand and if this is indeed what happened then perhaps free energy can be used for the good of humanity too. What was also never discussed either nor were there any photos of the air crafts that penetrated both towers, where did the planes go too, surely something else "dustified" them as well. This is an astounding observation by what appears to be a very qualified engineer. I am beginning to really believe something else happened than what the media has lead us to believe about the towers collapsing!!!!

beardogei, posted on April 23, 2014

What a way to explain it. I love this lady and how it all makes sence. Thank you for helping me understand how that steel just dematerialized in thin air. No one has ever proved that point as you have. Implications of H.A.R.P. with that storm moving away from the coast as well. Where are the planes and passengers of the planes? Were the plains hollowgrams ? If so did any real planes even hit or disapere that day and the people supposidly on them.
If this kind of weapon excist (which obviously does) what else have they used it for, I think back to what happened with Katrina in our southern states. Also the weird feeling and of electricty I get when everything I touch shocks me and I get an odd buzzing tone in my ears when it occures. Looks like a lot to ponder for my simple mind. It is why we have people like you to find these things out. What a clever mind you have. Thank you and many blessings to you and your loved ones.

Puptart, posted on April 22, 2014

Thank you for this amazing interview!

WaldorfmamaLJA, posted on March 21, 2014

it struck me when they were talking about the amount of bodies and body parts that were raining down from the buildings onto the fireman... that why haven't many of those
fireman come forward to speak about this aspect of the tragedy.? It would seem that the first responders would be an amazing source of "what happened that day".
I have never heard of anyone other than Judy talk about what the first responders saw and how it didn't get reported.

lauraburnell2681, posted on December 24, 2013

I have never believed that two planes could have created all the damage and devastation that happened to the towers and the world trade center building. I was disappointed that the planes were not mentioned and would have liked to hear Dr Wood's theory on what actually happened that day. Who did this? and how?

dasca222, posted on October 7, 2013

There is nothing scientific about the desperate attempt at debunking Dr. Judy Woods. It shows a sense of desperation and, frankly, character disturbance on the part of certain "debunkers." There is no further evidence laid out, only opinions and personal jabs. It is a disgusting sign of the times that this continues to go on. People with character and a brain can see through this charade. Whether explosives were used in some of the floors in no way diminishes the extraordinary evidence Dr. Woods has assembled. She is more qualified than any of the gang of experts trying to bring this false flag to the fore. If you are trying to make the realities of 9/11 palatable to the masses, you have a responsibility, if you aren't morally corrupt, to stick to the evidence, not the more marketable version of events. These distortions and lies make me doubt the sincerity of the quest. And, btw, I urge everyone to watch the spire "turn to dust" on youtube. Watch it with your own eyes rather than going with consensus of some "experts."

lrat001, posted on June 22, 2013

Watch the Batman begins movie and you'll see this weapon is mentioned. When I saw this mentioned it blew me away. Very interesting, how the movies shed light on these technologies. On the X-men movie there is a scene of levitating objects around Jean Grey. This is not science fiction really isn't

Jordan Thurston, posted on February 12, 2013

All the material that has been investigated supports precisely what Dr/ Wood's theory predicts. The evidence itself is crystal clear when a scientific method is utilized. The venial cowardice of the officials responsible for this should certainly qualify for the Hague.

jewellC, posted on January 31, 2013

No of the videos I have attempted to view would not play!!! The office is closed and I have no support... looking forward to reviewing...

BigMowma, posted on January 21, 2013

Dr. Wood doesn't have anything to gain by presenting the evidence to us clearly. She is not afraid to stand alone and point out what should have been obviousto the rest of us from the beginning - that the media and who ever elsewas behind the events on 9/11 played us like a cheap fiddle. She doesn't point fingers. She just lays it all out there. I admire her bravery and her willingness to stand by the truth.

carolcrumlish, posted on December 3, 2012

This interview is a must-see for everyone. I will be following up for myself by reading the book. A BIG salute to Dr. Woods. We all owe her a debt of gratitude for her courage to pursue what the evidence presents.

AshmoreMY, posted on November 22, 2012

Fascinating evidence which seems way more believable than what the media portrayed (and continues to). Definitely recommend.

Globedavis, posted on November 16, 2012

So much for the pancake theory.

lherbert, posted on October 20, 2012

I hear plenty of speculative suggestion from Dr. Wood, but nothing in the way of scientific analysis. Her hypothesis amounts to a wild theory that cannot be scientifically evaluated or corroborated.

Are we to gullibly accept her unique view of these events without any specific evidentiary support? The more I hear her speak, the more I'm convinced she is, ahem, "off the mark".

chieromancer, posted on September 15, 2013

There are so many factual errors, conjecture and pure speculation is this interview, I couldn't keep up.

I just want to make sure viewers understand one thing when listening to "conspiracy theorists," just because someone says it, doesn't mean it's true.

Sparky McBiff, posted on December 13, 2012

You say: "Where's the analysis" and "without any specific evidentiary support"?

Obviously you've never even glanced at her publication.
When it comes to examining evidence and "scientific evaluation" Dr. Woods incredibly massive hardcover text entitled "Where Did the Towers Go" puts any other analysis to shame. Her book is simply OVERFLOWING with masses of evidence that will overwhelm even the most scientific and it sets a new standard for impartial and emotionless examination of physical evidence without ascribing to any particular theory.
Most other evaluations of 911 seem to first decide on a explanation for the obviously not natural collapses and then look for the evidence to support their previous conclusion whereas Dr. Woods does the exact opposite.
I've been studying the topic for years and thought that I had come across almost all of the evidence available but Dr. Woods has simply gone far far above any previous standard set for examining physical evidence around 911.
To insinuate that it is nothing but a "wild theory" that has nothing to do with scientific analysis simply means you are being dishonest.
Those of us who have actually read her publication know better.
Perhaps you'd be better off to actually read her work and then criticize her the mass of evidence she presents rather than saying she doesn't present any.

nausmr, posted on October 19, 2012

I have studied as much research as I could possibly find about what happened that terrible day 9/11/2001 and met many of the researchers who have proposed their ideas. I have never met anyone like Dr. Judy Wood who I met on the 5th Anniversary of 9/11 in front of the Whitehouse on 9/11/2006. I have followed her research for over 6 years and found it to be the most comprehensive research about what happened in New York City at the World Trade Center complex. Dr Wood only looks at the evidence and interprets what that evidence is telling us. She is right to say that we first need to know what happened before we can say how it happened and who did it. Her book "Where Did The Towers Go?" does a masterful job of telling us what happened in New York City on 9/11/2001. If you have the curiosity to know what really happened read her book and you will be shocked to learn about a secret energy that was directed and used as a weapon.

pduffy4, posted on October 6, 2012

Thank you to both of you for this interview. Dr Judy Woods explanation is the only one I accept.

In my opinion those who don't accept what Dr Wood says have either not looked properly at her evidence or they are trying to cover-up what she says.

A question would be: "Does Dr Wood know how much energy it took to turn these buildings into dust"?

For those who don't know the movie War Of The Worlds with Tom Cruise shows people turning into dust and cars being flipped over by energy beams from the invading craft! This appears to mirror what happened on 9/11.

In higher states of consciousness everything is known, there are no secrets. One day we will all know who did 9/11 and the guilty will have serious karma for what they did. This is one of the problems of atheism, people think if they get away with it until the grave they have won, that is not how it is at all. I am a former atheist so I have been there and done that!

Pam, posted on September 18, 2012

Wow! What an amazing interview. I so admire people who have the courage to go out there on a limb with very little support. Thank you Dr Wood and Regina and to Gaiam. I could listen to your interviews all day and every day. Sure gets the brain looking at things very differently and trains us to think outside the square.

melrummel, posted on September 15, 2012

My fiance, (a scientist, engineer and holder of 40 patents worldwide) and I were stunned at this interview with Dr. Wood, and it motivated us to watch the Regina's excellent interview of Michael Coffman, completely dispelling man-caused global warming. It's our belief that his case against this outrageous, power-motivated claim has only gotten stronger since this articulate and fact-based interview. We also watched Regina's skillful interview with Michael Tellinger on UFO's and the possibility of free energy, and just with these 3 talks, it feels like pieces of an enormous conspiratorial puzzle are beginning to come together... Who is doing this and Why? I don't have the answer to 9/11, but in these other situations, those who are pulling the strings behind the curtain are very clear. If you're looking for more truth and most importantly, positive solutions, check out Thank you, Scott and Regina Meredith for your own courage in bringing us TRUTH!

Freespirit77, posted on September 15, 2012

The king is naked, after all. Can't you see?? oh yes, NOW we can. Great work, Judy, congratulations. There is still one big unanswered question. The importance of revealing the truth about 9/11 is immeasurable not only to the American people, but to ALL of us. We are hearing many versions, yet there is only one truth that needs to be told loud and clear, even though it will be hard to swallow: WHO did it and WHY?

Tommi, posted on September 14, 2012

Dr Wood is now one of my heroes. What a courageous, inspiration and model to all inquiring minds. We all need to just say know.

kirkal028, posted on September 14, 2012

One of the best interviews on this subject that Regina has done. Dr Wood's work is top notch and detailed. I didn't see anything but the official story for years til the 911 truth info had me questioning the event but this really got me thinking. Her work, questions and info/pictures reveal even more anamolies that should've been addressed by the truth movement and she deserves more attention and respect than she's gotten thus far. Thanks again Regina for the interview and thanks to you, Dr Wood, for your work and courage.

Fran Greicius, posted on September 14, 2012

Dr. Judy Wood is the only truth sayer on 911 who has stood her ground and not caved in to lesser mind sets. She deserves the highest praise possible which will not come for many years when the rest of us catch up to her. I can not imagine the pressure she has been under and what this has done to her personal life. She is absolutely amazing and if anyone deserves a nobel prize, it is her. God bless you, Dr Wood

Alfreda Weiss, posted on September 14, 2012

A sane place in the world of spin.

peacekeeper, posted on September 14, 2012

Kudos to Regina for speaking to facts concerning the gruesome details of those killed falling from the buildings. These facts were evidentiary in proposing Ms. Wood’s outstanding work. Moreover I am pleased to see that Gaiam Inc. understands and supports so-called ‘delicate’ disclosure that reflects the depths of the spiritual journey. In other words, Gaiam's (appreciated) leaning towards positive, joy-joy is not threatened by the darkness inherent in the spirit’s human adventure. We are seasoned souls with many lifetimes of carnage should one consider humanity’s history...
It is my sense that as we become better ‘aquainted’ with the viciousness (and sophistication) employed by Dark forces, we discover our latent powers of Light to navigate their corridors that will reveal just how vulnerable they truly are. And with Love, we will understand how to transform this powerful hologram of (evil) reality- bringing its entirety to conclusion. Rumi says, “search the heart of darkness and there you will find the light.”
A good interview leaving one to contemplate greater nefarious powers. Regina, as always, a pleasure to watch you work. :)

cm, posted on September 13, 2012

Really appreciating Regina's ability to do even more great in-depth reporting from her new alliance with Gaiam. This was a fascinating interview with much info I had not heard before about this topic. Bravo to Dr. Wood for her thoroughness, tenacity and bravery. I am loving my Gaiam subscription!

schmelonball, posted on September 13, 2012

What a great interview with Dr. Wood. It is about time that the facts about 9/11 get out and that we put our emotions on the back burner so we can see clearly. I remember watching the buildings turning to dust and standing there with my mouth open just observing and it didn't make sense. I must admit that I feel in the emotional sheeple line but just couldn't really understand what happened until Dr. Wood's book Where Did The Towers Go? came out. Her method of investigation should be taught in the classrooms. That is how you collect evidence to find out what really happened. Thank you Regina for interviewing Dr.Wood and thank you Dr. Wood for being brave enough to follow the evidence.

More From Gaia

Password is case sensitive.