In Denmark, near the border with Sweden, Lilou talks with Neils Harrit, Associate Professor, Emeritus, of Chemistry. He explains his own acceptance of the initial accounts of 9/11 and walks us through the stages of his growing skepticism of the official accounts. He feels that the official explanation is a violation of physical principals as explained by Isaac Newton. He offers that the only way the collapse of Building Seven could have happened is through a controlled explosion.
He explains his own understanding of the chemical reactions that would have been involved for the controlled explosion. He also hints at potential negative implications for scientist who may present evidence that is contrary to the official accounts. There is a change in academia as to control and funding. The concern is that scientific information is now being regulated by the people in power and not by the scientists doing the work.
In the end he is calls for an ethical forensic examination of all the evidence to determine if a crime really has occurred.