David Wilcock discloses evidence, gathered by the world’s space administrations, which may prove the existence of ancient civilizations. We know that evidence of extraterrestrial activity on and about Mars has been suppressed from the eye of the public. Either by accident or by design, scant traces of information showing remnants of advanced civilizations occasionally slip through the cracks. All it takes is a keen eye and sharp wit to find the ruins on Mars and Phobos. This presentation was originally presented December 21, 2015. Read the full episode transcript here! Don't miss a single episode of Wisdom Teachings Watch the entire series of Wisdom Teachings <a href="/show/wisdom-teachings-david-wilcock" target=_"blank">here</a>. Transcript
DAVID WILCOCK: Welcome, dear friend. It's me, your buddy, David, and this is "Wisdom Teachings." Are you ready for the ruins of Mars and Phobos? I am. I don't want to waste any time. I've got a lot of stuff to get through in this episode. We're talking about an intelligent civilization that was on a super Earth here in our solar system kind of like what you see here, where there was a very large planet with oceans and continents and then Mars was actually a smaller moon captured in the orbit of the super Earth that also had the oceans. Corey Goode has said that this is a very common thing that actually happens. But think about how millions of years could go by where these cultures are isolated from each other and civilizations arise independently. And then when they get technological, they have a war. Well, apparently, that's exactly what happened. The super Earth was blown up 500,000 years ago. It lines up with the Law of One; with what Bruce said; with what my space program insider, Jacob, said; with what Pete Peterson has said; and with what Corey Goode has said. All the insiders say 500,000 years ago. Apparently, this was extensively studied in a project secretly code named Brilliant Pebbles. And what they found was that this blast wave knocked Mars out of being a moon and made it into its own separate planet. And one of the things that was orbiting around Mars, as well, or was in the orbit of the super Earth, was a smaller moon that was an aircraft hangar, a spacecraft hangar, that's Phobos, orbiting Mars. So Phobos took very heavy damage in this explosion and it crushed it just like you're crushing a tin can in your hand. So Mars' moon, Phobos, both shows evidence of it being a heavily damaged spacecraft base, as I was just saying in the previous episode. And we're going to get more into this in this episode and show you some additional proof where the spherical surface apparently crunched in on itself and then it continued to degrade over hundreds of thousands of years since this original explosion, looking like what you see right here. Notice again that there are geometrically positioned stress lines which clearly seem to show some sort of undergirding structure that it was originally built out of. When you look at this image here, you see that they are latitudinal and longitudinal, they're at 90 degree angles to each other-- in Richard C. Hoagland's terms, rectilinear geometry. That's what it's all about, baby. That's not natural, that's what happens when people build stuff. This is an artificial sphere and it got crunched. It used to be round. And there's some very interesting data that leaked from the European Space Agency that we're going to see in just a few minutes here about that. In the previous episode-- we're not going to do it again-- I showed you a video clip of Buzz Aldrin on C-SPAN trying to support the NASA push to go out and make a mission to Mars by getting people interested in it. People are so apathetic between selfies and texting on their phones-- sorry I've got to take this, sorry. They're not interested so you've got to get something to kick start the interest of the public. Well, what did they do? They sent an astronaut out on TV and he says, yeah, why don't we go out and take a look at this monolith that's on Phobos? He doesn't say it's like a monolith, he doesn't say something that could be a natural formation, he says it's a monolith. Who built it, where did they come from, what is it doing there? Well, I teased you last time so now we're going to get to the core of this, of the actual image that he's talking about. And again, skeptics please, guys-- please. It's a NASA astronaut. Don't frickin' tell me that this guy has no credibility. Are you for real? The NASA astronaut went on C-SPAN and said that it's a monolith. Get over yourself. I'm done. I'm done, I'm good. It's all good. These skeptics, man. But you know, they defend their paradigm. It's a religion, you see, the belief system they don't want to give up. Because if you have incorrect information in your mind, in our school system you get an F. That's a failure. You're a failure if things that you believe are not true. That's what they teach us. That's how we resist the truth because we don't want to be socially ostracized, right? But this guy's a NASA astronaut and he's coming out and telling you it's a monolith. Let's see what he's talking about. Well, there it is right there. That red circle at the top is where on Phobos this is located. Then when we zoom in on it, we can clearly see something that is poking up from the surface high enough that it's creating quite a shadow. Natural stuff doesn't do that. That's why a NASA astronaut is telling you this is not natural, he's telling you it's a monolith. I think he knows what he's talking about. Hoagland's colleague, Ephron Palermo, did this analysis of the shadow cast by the monolith and he actually shows how it's in line with the sun and this is his mockup of what he actually thinks is there. Now, I've spoken to Corey Goode; as well as Hoagland's insider, Bruce; as well as the space program insider, Jacob; as well as Pete Peterson. The consensus from the insiders is that the ancient builder race actually built the caverns inside Phobos which are cubicle and did hold ships, spacecraft-- very large spacecraft, I might add. But new people came by later and they wanted to find out what was going on in there and they built this monolith as their base and their landing area, where they could then drill into the moon, pressurize the drilling entrance so they don't lose any gas, and then have a place that they can enter into and go down through. And I believe that, although Palermo didn't make it in this illustration, that it's actually an obelisk, which would be in line with their religious beliefs of these extraterrestrials and emulating the ancient builder race, which has obelisks all over the solar system. So you've got to think a little bit in order to understand what we're seeing here. Now, this is what made me go nuts. I was in regular contact with Richard C. Hoagland in back in 2010 and he starts call me on the phone very, very excited because he had a contact within the European Space Agency where they had taken sonar readings of the interior of Phobos with the Mars Express space probe and had absolute proof-- full three-dimensional reconstructions-- that the interior had rooms that were cubical or rectangular in shape. They had absolute virtual reality reconstructions that showed not only cubicle rooms, but what appeared to be artifacts and objects inside those rooms. The data was that good. Now, we were told that ESA, European Space Agency, was going to come forward with this. I was very excited. I thought this was going to be the final straw that breaks the Cabal's back. But what do they do? It's the same thing they always do, they infiltrated this and they shut it down. But the insiders in the ESA who were going to tell us the truth did manage to get some of it out. And I'm going to show you the part that did leak because that alone is very compelling. Let's check it out right now. First of all, if you want to see Richard's write-up on the data that we actually did get-- and he didn't get the juice, because again, the insiders never got to release what they really wanted to say-- but the paper on his website is /phobos.html and the title is "For the World is Hollow and I have Touched the Sky." And he's talking about Phobos being hollow, as we're about to see. Now, this is the Mars Express and it was taking all these telemetries around Phobos. And what it's doing specifically-- it's a little bit confusing, there's going to be some high geek speak here-- it's called radiometrics. And the radiometric scans are actually intended to measure how much gravity Phobos is kicking off as the probe goes around it. And what happens is if the moon Phobos was entirely solid, the gravity would have a very smooth curve but if there were cavities inside Phobos, then the gravity is going to alter a little bit because as you move around different parts of Phobos, you're going to have more mass or less mass depending on whether you're over a solid area or over a hollow area. And that means it's going to talk on the satellite a little more this way or a little more this way and deviate from the true graph. That's exactly what you see right here. Now, when you see this blue line what you're actually seeing-- and I know this is geeky, but hey, that's why you watch my, show right-- the model is the blue line. That's the gravity they we're supposed to see, but then the actual gray lines, the kind of fuzzy line, is what they actually saw when they made the closest approach. So zero is the closest approach to Phobos minus 600 is minus 600 seconds, which would be 10 minutes, and then the plus 600 is 10 minutes after the space probe passed Phobos. And when you see on the top of the breath 10 seconds after it's passed Phobos at the closest approach, the gravity is all wrong. In fact, it's not pulling enough. There's not enough gravity. It's as if they're going over a hollow area at that point, and that is exactly what they calculated. Let's see what they actually said in the ESA paper that Hoagland quotes from in this groundbreaking article. "The Mars Express Radio-Science team, led by Martin Paetzold from Cologne University, has performed a preliminary analysis of the radiometric data recorded during the evening of the closest approach on March 3, 2010. The gray line in the image above shows the frequency change due to Phobos during a 20-minute window centered on its closest approach." I explained all this to you before. Before the closest approach, the effect of Phobos on the spacecraft is negligible-- it's well within the theoretical range. Then there is a clear jump in frequency at the closest approach. This is Phobos slightly changing the orbit of Mars Express due to its irregular mass, i.e., hollowness inside, as you're about to see. This is where this think gets so interesting. So once again, there's the deviation, as you see on the top there. That's what they're talking about. The blue line is the expected frequency change assuming the mass of Phobos is evenly distributed throughout the moon's interior. And again, this is ESA talking. You go read the scientific paper from Hoagland's page, OK? So the mass was not evenly distributed. There are clearly small differences between the blue and gray lines. And then the challenge now for the Radio-Science team is to dig into these small differences to pry out information on the distribution of the mass inside Phobos. Patzold says, "The real work starts right here." "It may take a few weeks for the extraction of precise information on the interior of Phobos," says Tom Andert from Munich University. Well, guess what-- they already had the information and it was being obstructed. And what they saw as I said, was a three-dimensional reconstruction of absolutely undeniable cubicle rooms inside Phobos. They put enough technology on the Mars Express to definitely do that in the same way they use ground penetrating radar to do it here on Earth. Believe me, they wouldn't have sent that probe out there without the best that we have. It's just that they weren't allowed to tell us what they got. So let's read a little bit more now from Hoagland's article, because this is extremely interesting. Somebody made a comment on this ESA article and he got it. This was Daniel Fisher and he makes some leading statements. "Thanks to the Cologne people and ESA for sharing these hot non-imaging data, even without vertical scales-- a clever and acceptable way to show success without compromising scientific details." So they're not actually showing you how much of a change in vertical there is or where it is. They're not compromising the details, OK, because the details would reveal these cubicled rooms. Let's read what he says now. "Though, as the total mass of Phobos and the C/A distance are both known, reconstructing these 'missing' residuals should be possible for any physicist, right?" And again, he's making a leading statement there. So this is really interesting stuff, because people were getting it. But Hoagland was never allowed to leak the whole thing with accurate stuff because it was withheld. We couldn't get those images where they showed us how it was cubicle on the inside. Now we have another quote in Hoagland's article from the Phobos blog. Let's read this. This is actually a space agency blog, not Hoagland's. So it's from the General Science section of the Phobos blog from NASA or ESA, I believe. The radio science result from the 2008 Phobos flyby has now been accepted for scientific publication and the quote from the guy that's talking in this blog says, "I've just heard that the technical paper discussing the mass and density of Phobos as determined during the Mars Express 2008 flyby has been accepted by the scientific journal "Geophysical Research Letters." The abstract is as follows-- we'll just continue right along here-- this is unbelievable. "We report independent results from two subgroups of the Mars Express Radio Science team who independently analyzed Mars Express radio tracking data for the purpose of determining consistently the gravitational attraction of the moon Phobos on the Mars Express spacecraft, and hence calculating the mass of Phobos." The mass is what stuff is inside the moon-- where is it, how much is there, where is it positioned. That's what they're measuring now. So now we're going to have some geek speak for you. Look, this is "Wisdom Teachings," it's not "Dummy Teachings," it's not the beginner class so let's just dive into this geek speak. Because if you kind of sort through what it says, and I've highlighted for you the part that you need to pay attention to, boom-- they drop it on you. Check this out. "New values for the gravitational parameter and density of Phobos provide meaningful constraints on the range of the body's porosity"-- that means how hollow is it. 30%-- there's the red-- 30% plus or minus 5 percent. That means it's 30% hollow on the inside, which provide the basis for an improved interpretation of Phobos' internal structure. So if you can sort through the Geek speak and you know what you're reading, is that 1/3 of the interior of Phobos is a hollow cavity, 30% plus or minus 5%. That's over 33% on the average. It's not a solid object. Now, let's go on and read even more from this Phobos blog because kaboom, they really drop the bomb here. Check it out. We conclude that the interior of Phobos likely contains large voids. Well, what do they look like? That's the part they're not telling you. They're giving you everything else. Let's go on and read a little more. When applied to various hypotheses bearing on the origin of Phobos, these results are inconsistent with the proposition that Phobos is a captured asteroid. No, it's a hollowed out moon with apparently some very cool stuff in there that these people who built the monolith decided they were going to dig down inside because they wanted to find out what the heck was going on in there just like anybody else. So if ESA is going to tell us that 1/3 of the interior of Phobos is large, empty voids, than what the heck is Phobos? Well, this is what I've been telling you-- it's a collapsed base that at one time was spherical camouflaged to look like a moon. When the super Earth exploded, bam, it crunched it down like a soda can. And now we see these stress lines, these geometric fractures, of the original superstructure, the support structure. And of course we're seeing this monolith on the surface that Buzz Aldrin was talking about, which is where the new people apparently landed to get inside. So now I want to take you to Mars itself because there are monuments on the surface of Mars. This has always been the crown jewel of Richard C. Hoagland's work at enterprisemission.com and his classic, classic book that I read all the way back in 1993. I consider myself very fortunate that I got a head start on this. The book is also called "The Monuments of Mars" and there is so much information here it's unbelievable. July 1, 1976, Viking goes over Mars and from this frame that you're seeing right here, 35A76, boom, we have a face poking out and looking at you. And I saw this in a child's astronomy magazine I was subscribed to called "Odyssey" in approximately 1981 and it blew my doors off because right away I said, that does not belong there. There's something very strange about this. And they were calling it a face on Mars in the magazine. The thing that's so weird about the face on Mars is not just that it's only one weird monument that doesn't belong there. Look at what's going on off to the left. If you haven't already seen this before, when I was in college back in '94 or '95 I used to have my copy of "Monuments to Mars" and I'd open it up to the photo section, I'd go around and show people in the student union building this image and I actually had people come back and tell me I was part of a cult and then concoct this whole weird theory that I was trying to mess with them and control their mind because their reality bubble was not permeable enough to accept what they were seeing. Because take a look, there's the face on Mars-- you can see it very clearly now, off to the right casting a nice triangular shadow, very clearly looking like a face with a headdress around it. But then what do we see off to the left at the top there? We see some stuff that very clearly looks like pyramids. Let's take another zoom in on that. Boom, that is very bizarre. You can almost see the image of the pyramid. Look, you don't have to think about it, it's right there. We have Corey Goode on "Cosmic Disclosure" saying that he was in a spacecraft flying over Mars looking at these pyramids, that they're covered with dust but that parts of the pyramids are still exposed and you can actually see the stone underneath, OK? And there are images that have been reconstructed by Enterprise Mission looking at it from the side. This was done in '98 by Dr. Mark Carlotto with the reddish color added in for what the Mars surface looks like now. You see the city of pyramids on the left, you see the face up near the top, very clearly face-like with a little headdress around it. And now I want you to look at the bottom right. If you haven't seen this before, that's pretty shocking, too, because that's also very clearly a pyramid. And as you're going to see in other images, it's not only a five-sided pyramid, it's a five-sided pyramid in the human shape of the arms and legs out like the "Vitruvian Man" by Leonardo da Vinci. Humans built this stuff. This is a human signature, this is not natural. This is not Jesus on a potato chip, this is not somebody tripping out on wood grain on LSD, this is frickin' monuments on Mars that were built by somebody who was human. That's what I'm trying to tell you, that's what we've been trying to say all these years. I couldn't believe going back on Hoagland's forum and seeing how vociferously people would hate on him just for showing you the obvious truth, which is that this is not natural. Geological processes don't do this stuff. Why would these highly anomalous landforms all be clustered together so closely? And they're clearly architecture, they're clearly things people could live in because that pyramid is like two miles wide, the one on the bottom right there. You could have a billion people living just inside that pyramid alone. And there may actually been a civilization, possibly even of the Draco, that colonized the surface of Mars for a while before getting destroyed. That may be what we're looking at here because according to my space program insider, Jacob, the face on Mars with its punched out nose and mouth area is what the Draco face looks like. So that's an interesting conjecture. So here's the five-sided pyramid on Mars. And one of the really weird things about this is that it looks as if a missile hit the floor next to where the pyramid is, hit the ground. You can see the entry point of the missile, you can see the hole there, the black round spot, and you can see where the dome then exploded from the inside and the hot, molten material then melted off and created a runoff pool that you can see there on the bottom. So it clearly appears that there were people living in there and Hoagland conjectures that there could have been as much as a billion or more people that could have lived just inside this pyramid if they were all packed in very nicely. And when they got hit by that missile, everybody was wiped out. This is probably part of the war that happened, and it could also have been part of the war that occurred while Maldek was still a planet. In fact, that's highly likely that that's when this took place. You can still see where the missile hit. It's really, really fascinating. And here is a shot where the "Vitruvian Man" is superimposed over the five-sided pyramid, clearly showing that the pyramid is anthropomorphic. It's got the human form written into the way it was built. It is not a perfectly symmetrical pentagon. It's symmetrical to an intelligent human body. That's really, really wild and cool stuff. So NASA comes along and this is while Art Bell has an audience of 20 million people and Richard C. Hoagland is his number one guest and they're talking about the face on Mars all the time. Art is creating political momentum and then NASA says, well, we're going to release the best quality image of the face that we've ever showed you. There's all this big buildup and then what they released was so ridiculous that Art branded it the cat box and that name totally stuck. This is the disgraceful NASA cat box image, their attempt to whitewash what was going on. What you see here on the left is this completely ridiculous enhanced version where NASA tweaked all the Photoshop stuff you can do to wash out all of the contrast that would make it look three-dimensional. Oh, that's just some thing. But when we go back and we actually add the color back in, you can still clearly see that it is a mesa. Now, this is what's so interesting is that other scientists from the ESA did not go along with NASA's cover-up and they released this image right here, which was taken from other space probes in color and clearly shows the simian side of the face and then the lion side on the other side. Now, the simian could also be reptilian, reptilian humanoid. But you clearly have a man and a lion like the Sphynx, right? Wow. OK, so this is a Sphynx like monument, but it's on Mars-- a monument of a face which actually is positioned so that as the sun rises, it's going to rise over the face if you're over there in that city of pyramids that I showed you before. This stuff is unbelievable. And this one scientist, Newcomb-- interesting name-- in ESA stood against the Cabal and released a three-dimensional projection based on stereo models taken from multiple camera shots. He used multiple angles and he showed you how this thing actually looks on the surface of Mars. This is unbelievable, check it out. You can clearly now see that this is a symmetrical face shaped object that pokes up from the surface that's got a headdress around it, it's got two eyes, it's got a mouth, it's got a nose, it's got a chin. It is exactly what we would expect it to be. And that is truly fascinating. It's very degraded, so the original surface-- remember, this probably was on the surface of the planet when Maldek blew up. So it might also be that what you're seeing on the side facing you is where the blast wave hit the strongest and actually melted and destroyed the way the face originally looked. But enough of it survived that it still has this lion type appearance, which is very, very interesting. Then we also have another really cool aspect of Hoagland's work that he goes into great detail about in "Monuments of Mars," which is that the actual monuments on the Cydonia Plateau give you all kinds of really cool geometric theorems. For me, I spent years tripping out on this stuff. This is an example where all he's doing now is looking at the five-sided pyramid, called the D&M Pyramid, and what you're seeing is all these different imagings of hexagonal symmetry which is 60 degree angles, pentagonal symmetries both included in there, all these various angles. What does all this stuff mean? Well, it's a lot more complex than I'm going to go into in this episode, but Hoagland describes that this is the physics of a tetrahedron, which is a pyramid but it's made out of equilateral triangles-- I've showed you these before-- inside a sphere. And he says that this is the physics of energy in planets and that the energy flows out through these tetrahedral latitudes, which happen to be 19.5 degrees above or below the equator, depending on whether the point is on the North Pole, in which case it's on the south, or the South Pole, in which case it's on the north. So this data about Mars and these geometric portions of how that Cydonia Plateau is laid out. I'm not even beginning to cover all of it. It is very mathematical and that's beyond what I wanted to do for this particular show at this time. I've written about on my website before, but there's a lot of really cool things in there like the relationship between the constant e and pi, e/pi, which is one of these things that shows you the tetrahedral geometry. It turns out that that science of the tetrahedron is a science that leads to free energy, anti gravity, teleportation technology, the secret to matter energy and consciousness. So whoever built these monuments didn't just make them into pyramids and a giant face, they also encoded geometric theorems into the monuments. All right. Well, this is mind blowing stuff, huh? That's all the time we have in this episode. Come back next time and we're going to get even more into the fascinating mysteries of Mars here on "Wisdom Teachings." I'm your host, David Wilcock, and I thank you for watching.