Is a Tesseract a Wrinkle in Time?
Did a coming of age story set in a science fiction context plant the seeds of quantum physics in popular culture in the 1960s? When Madeleine L’Engle wrote “A Wrinkle in Time” in the late 1950s, quantum theory was in its infancy, but was being nurtured by the likes of Max Planck, Niels Bohr, and a cohort of other theoretical physicists.
In 1962, L’Engle entered new literary realms with the adaptation of quantum physics in the form of the “tesseract,” a theory of dimensional travel. She also brought a female protagonist to the male-dominated science fiction genre, another groundbreaking move. That was 50-plus years ago — now the tesseract model, essentially a 4D analogue of a cube, appears in fiction, comic books and film, and is used by science to describe dimensional processes and systems such as DNA sequences.
After being rejected by at least 40 publishers, L’Engle’s book “A Wrinkle in Time,” was finally published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, and went on to win the prestigious John Newbery medal in 1963. The book, an instant classic, continued to garner honors over the following five decades. Fourteen million copies of “A Wrinkle in Time” have sold since the first edition.
The word “tesseract” was invented by eccentric British mathematician and science fiction writer Charles Howard Hinton, who coined the term in his 1888 article, “What is the Fourth Dimension.” Quantum theory is now common parlance in theoretical physics. But L’Engle’s prescient story-telling introduced tesseract theory to generations of young readers. This notion of interdimensional travel via the tesseract was seeded into collective consciousness and continually appeared above the pop culture waterline in the form of comic books and film.
“Love is the one thing we’re capable of perceiving that transcends dimensions of time and space.” Dr. Amelia Brand, “Interstellar”
In 2006, “Tesseract the Everywhere Man” appeared as a character in a 2006 comic book series, the Ultimate Fantastic Four #33. Tesseract as a thing rather than a theory appeared as “The Cosmic Cube” in Marvel Comics in 1974 — a talisman giving cosmic powers to the possessor, with several iterations throughout the franchise.
In film, A thriller starring Jonathan Rhys-Meyers, “The Tesseract,” was released in 2003, based on a book of the same name by Alex Garland. “Captain America: The First Avenger” was the next movie in 2011. The cinematic “cosmic cube” has been punted from one Marvel movie franchise to another, i.e., the “Thor” series and “The Avengers.”
In film, a thriller starring Jonathan Rhys-Meyers, “The Tesseract,” was released in 2003, based on a book of the same name by Alex Garland. “Captain America: The First Avenger” was the next movie in 2011. The cinematic “cosmic cube” has been punted from one Marvel movie franchise to another, i.e., the “Thor” series and “The Avengers.”
The tesseract returned to big screens in “Interstellar” in 2014 — a big-budget, science fiction movie starring Matthew McConaughey, Jessica Chastain, Anne Hathaway, and Michael Caine. And now the tesseract has returned home, travelling full circle with the March, 2018 release of “A Wrinkle in Time” based on L’Engle’s book.
In the book, the tesseract was described by a simple line drawing of an ant traveling on a string held taught. But in “Interstellar,” the tesseract is imagined as a complex, dimensional grid structure accessed via the event horizon of a black hole. This reflects the complexity of the theory, now fleshed out by geometry, describing the tesseract as a “four dimensional analog of a cube — the tesseract is to the cube as the cube is to the square.”
Beloved of physicists and mathematicians, tesseract theory, part of relativity theory, now encompasses formulas and descriptions of Euclidean space. Theorists use the tesseract concept to describe multi-dimensional space or objects. According to mathforum.org, “Physicists suggest that the extra dimensions are quite large; so large that our world exists inside of a higher-dimensional reality.”
Others posit that the tesseract is actually a model of the universe, while some use art to describe the concept. Economists and biologist have adopted the theory to visualize the state of systems in imaginary space. Life scientists use the model to describe DNA sequences as dimensional “hypercubes” to understand mutations in viruses.
In 2003, “A Wrinkle in Time” was adapted for a Disney-produced television movie premiering at the Toronto Children’s Film Festival, and as a Disney special in 2004. This version received negative reviews — even L’Engle said, “I have glimpsed it…I expected it to be bad and it was.”
But the story has at last returned as a feature-length film that stays true to the plot by putting the sophisticated concepts of tesseracts and multi-dimensionality under the dominance of a universal concept of love. While “Interstellar” explores these theme from a different angle, it arrives at a similar conclusion — that love and gravity are the same energy, and that powerful loving intention actually directs gravitational force. In “Interstellar,” Dr. Amelia Brand, played by Anne Hathaway, says, “Love isn’t something we invented. It’s observable. Powerful. It has to mean something. Love is the one thing we’re capable of perceiving that transcends dimensions of time and space.”
Swiss Physicist and researcher Nassim Haramein, in his work in physics, quantum mechanics, comes to a similar conclusion, asserting that “Love is the unified field of everything.”
Many observe the convergence of spirituality and science as a cultural revolution that redefines what have been, up until recently, two seperate paradigms. The controversial comedian Bill Hicks, who died in 1993, came to a similar conclusion. “It’s just a simple choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of love see all of us as one. Take all that money we spend on weapons and defenses each year and spend it feeding, clothing and educating the poor of the world, and we could explore space, together, both inner and outer, forever, and in peace.”
If the Universe is a Simulation, Can We Hack It?
In 2003, Nick Bostrom published a paper proposing three scenarios he says he believes are likely to be true about our reality. One of those possibilities is that we are living in a computer simulation, a theory gaining increasing attention in our era of prevailing tech fascination. But if the universe is a simulation, can it be hacked?
Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
We’ve heard from a number of scientists and thought leaders, including Elon Musk, it’s likely we’re living in a computer-simulated reality. Musk said he believes there’s a one-in-billions chance we’re living in “base reality,” or a non-simulated, completely organic existence.
It’s also becoming more apparent that mathematics is the language of nature — a universal dialectical that can be used to describe everything, from the inconceivably large to the infinitesimally small. As we continue to acquire more insight on this reality, it appears we may be living in what appears to be a physical construct that might actually be generated from code.