The Only Thing That’s Real
“Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex. It takes a touch of genius to move in the opposite direction.”
Depending whom you ask, reality is a relative thing. Each and every human collects life experience that colors his or her understanding of the world around them. This perspective is what we collectively call reality.
Some experiences — hunger, cold, bowel movements — are common enough to constitute our shared reality. Other scenarios — telepathy, UFOs, the Illuminati — are less common, making that which is incontrovertibly real for one person a frivolous flight of fancy for another.
The search for what is interminably real is the ultimate quest for spiritual seekers from every tradition. For physicists, the Holy Grail is that elusive “Theory of Everything.”
Though the names and methods may differ, there is a shared sense that underlying the infinite variety of manifest creation there must be some essential, unifying factor.
In the Hindu tradition — more accurately named sanatana dharma, or “the eternal natural way” — this unifying substratum of all existence is known as Brahman. Realization of Brahman is the only goal of life.
In physics, the pursuit of Brahman translates to solving for equations that unite relative and quantum theories, resolving the discrepancies in our current conceptions of micro- and macroscopic functions and demonstrating how infinities interact coherently within the finite.
Big ideas, yes? Not to worry — this simple blog will solve it all. We begin on the philosophical side.
Real vs Unreal
Vedanta is an ancient philosophy concerned with determining what is real versus unreal.
The word Veda means “knowledge.” The Vedas are the foundational texts of India’s timeless spiritual tradition (sanatana dharma). Vedanta is derived from the Upanishads, which are the final section of the Vedas. Vedanta literally means “the end of knowledge.” Interpreted one step further, the word Vedanta implies “that knowledge beyond which there is nothing to know.”
One of the practical methods offered for discerning real from unreal is the process of negation, known as neti neti, or “not this, not this.”
The assertion is that anything real is always real, and cannot be negated. Something unreal may appear for a time, but if it can be negated, it will sooner or later return to the non-existence from whence it arose.
Is the human body real?
Our instinctual answer is that yes, of course it is, but let us see. The body is a conglomerate of organ systems — skin, blood, fat, muscle, bone, etc. These organs are in constant flux. The lungs, for example, are rarely more than three weeks old; your taste buds are renewed every ten days.
Therefore, the body is not one stable, solid thing. It is ever changing, and reducible to its various components. As such, according to Vedanta, the body is unreal.
Okay, but what about those organs? Well, they are composed of billions of little cells. Those cells are each their own ecosystem, with a cell wall, cytoplasm, nucleus and so on.
Deeper still, each cell is made of atoms. The word atom comes from Greek and means “indivisible.” For many years after their discovery, atoms were considered the most fundamental unit of matter.
Near the end of the 19th century, however, the existence of subatomic particles was scientifically confirmed, allowing us to continue our current quest toward the tiniest body part, in search of something real.
If not atoms, electrons, right? If not electrons, surely then quarks. If not a quark, then perhaps the Higgs-Boson? At these extremely microscopic levels, the truth is that matter is almost entirely made of “empty” space.
I invite you to perform the neti neti experiment on everything you believe to be real. The result is always the same. As you break things down into their constituent parts, you find that at each level there is yet another layer to be negated. If it can be negated, it is not real.
You can zoom as far down as you like, using your imagination to transcend the limits of our most powerful microscopes, negating layer after layer, but with infinite recursion, at some point you just have to stop.
Realization of Brahman
Ultimately, the great philosophers and God-realized beings are on record insisting that only Brahman is real. This is where our intellectual exercise hits its limit, and the truth can only be experienced, never explained. But before you run off to meditate for several decades in pursuit of this experience, let’s see if some elementary geometry can help.
The first lesson in geometry concerns dimension. Here, let’s watch Nassim Haramein describe his experience as a schoolboy.
If you’re a Gaia subscriber (and if you’re not, you really should be), I highly recommend the documentary Black Whole. This same information is beautifully animated in the first 13 minutes of that film. For now, please watch this clip called Sacred Geometry and Unified Fields from about the 3:30 until the 8:30 mark.
If you just watched all 3 hrs and 36 minutes of Nassim’s presentation, you’re a genius now and know everything. For the rest of us, let’s walk through the process.
In the story, Nassim’s teacher leads the students through the dimensions. He says:
“The dot is Dimension 0, and it doesn’t exist… Then, [the teacher] put a bunch of dots together to make a line and called it Dimension 1, and said that didn’t exist either… Then, he put four lines together and made a plane, called it Dimension 2, and said that doesn’t exist either because it still doesn’t enclose volume… He took six of these non-existing planes, put them together to make a cube and said now the planes enclose volume, this is Dimension 3, and that’s the one you exist in.”
Nassim’s keen young mind is reeling with questions and contradictions now. He realizes that “… if the dot doesn’t exist, the line doesn’t exist, the plane doesn’t exist, then the cube can’t exist and you don’t have existence. You have non-existence to the 4th power.”
He didn’t know it at the time, but this is a problem with which some of our greatest thinkers have grappled — Pythagoras, Plato, Euclid, Buckminster Fuller — and no one has quite solved it.
Notice how this problem is not dissimilar from the Vedantic question about what is real. In both cases, we are confronted with the objectively provable unreality of everything we can see and touch and know to be real.
In the attempt to describe the essential nature of things, we quickly encounter a paradox so perplexing that most of us — yogis and astrophysicists alike — just ignore it and move on.
Unfortunately, as Haramein points out, “These fundamental axioms of geometry are what most of our math and physics are based on.”
When our starting point is so deeply flawed, is it any wonder that the ensuing equations fail to satisfy our quest for a unified theory? As it turns out, Harramein has a solution.
“The way to solve the dimensional problem is to reverse the axiom completely and say, the only thing that exists is the dot.”
As per the neti, neti experiment, we know everything big to be made out of something small. In geometrical terms, the cube is made of planes. The plane is made of lines. The line is made of dots.
If, at this point, we agree that “the dot” is the most fundamental layer, unable to be negated, equivalent to Brahman, then some very interesting possibilities arise. Haramein observes,
“Within the dot is infinite amount of division. Everything is made out of dots, and the dots are arranged differently, and that makes up our whole world.”
In the film Black Whole, Haramein presents a series of graphics to illustrate what is meant by “within the dot,” and how a finite system can contain infinities.
First, we take a circle (which could be a sphere), and define it as our finite space (our dot, or boundary condition). Then, we divide that circle so that it encloses an equilateral triangle. Quoting from the film now:
“The universe is polarized. Everything in the universe seems to spin. Spin produces polarity. So we would have a reverse triangle at the same time.”
“We have now created a new boundary condition, at the next fractal level down, the next iteration down.”
“Notice that these new boundaries all are centered around a very specific center. Each of the boundaries define a very specific structure [or] coordinate in space-time. Therefore each of the boundaries can be defined as a very specific set of information.”
“I can continue to divide the space to produce new boundary conditions. Now I’ve got another iteration down, and another set of information… I can continue to do this and create new boundaries again, and at this point, you can imagine that if I give this to my computer… it could do this to infinity.
“However, I would never, ever, ever ever exceed that first boundary I produced for myself. So here, I’ve embedded infinite amount of divisions, infinite amount of information, within the confines of a finite space.
“So, in very simple terms I’ve shown to you that infinities and finite structures are complimentary… And if this is true, this simple concept could change all of our concepts of physics, including our concepts of our relationship to the universe.”
Infinity Is Within Us
The human body is a finite system. There is a physically identifiable place where our body ends and the outside world begins. And yet, the neti, neti experiment and Nassim Haramein’s geometry prove that this finite system can and indeed does contain infinities.
Is this not what every great spiritual tradition has promised? That divinity (infinity) dwells within us? Well, here’s the mathematical proof.
As described in my previous article, The Thing That Connects All Things, the spherical electromagnetic field encircling every human makes us literally dot-like. According to Quadrivium, “Einstein discovered that a point in four dimensions (i.e. you here and now) is a sphere expanding at the speed of light, and all we can see of the entire universe is inside an event horizon sphere.”
Meaning: We are so many billions of individual dots zipping around within the confines of a larger dot named Earth. Dot Earth plays its role along with other planet-dots composing the grand dot that is our solar system, which itself is just one dot among billions within the incomprehensibly magnificent dot that is the Milky Way galaxy. Onward we zoom endlessly out and out into the expanse of space, never escaping the primeval dot we call Brahman.
One characteristic of Brahman is that it is always full. Which is to say, it cannot be added to or subtracted from. Every other dot could disappear today and that Brahman dot would remain as it is, whole and complete.
Ostensibly, Brahman is the primary dot, providing the field within which all subsequent dots arise, exist and subside. It doesn’t matter how far we zoom in or out, or how many iterations or geometric variations arise, we are still within the scope of that first dot, the singularity.
In “The Power of Spin,” a short film produced by The Resonance Project, Dr Michael Hyson says:
“If you think of the whole universe as a fractal series of singularities…There’s really only one thing in the whole universe, it’s all just folded up a lot — into trees and dolphins and honey bees and humans — but we’re all made of the same stuff. And if all the information is available in the event horizon [the boundary condition], then all the information in the entire universe is available from every point.”
You are one of these points. So am I. Deep within we know this, except we exist in a state of constant forgetting. If and when we remember this profound reality, then all the information in the universe is suddenly at our fingertips, infused into every cell of our being.
This is a massive download, I know, but give it a try. The third dimension wherein we live is inherently fickle, literally a light speed blur of opposite pairs flickering on and off, in and out of “reality.” When finding ourselves inside out and upside down, it is of great benefit to remember what is real and what is not. Only Brahman is real. There is only the dot.
- Main article image courtesy of Cosmic Armour Art by Anna Kumashov and used with permission.
- “Within the dot” images are from the film Black Whole (links above), available for your viewing pleasure right here on Gaiam TV.
- Electromagnetic field is from The Resonance Project’s facebook page.
- Universe image is from the film Thrive: What on Earth Will it Take, also available right here on Gaiam TV.
Is a Parallel Universe Changing Our Reality?
Sometimes referred to as the Berenstain Bears Conspiracy, the Mandela Effect is a phenomenon in which people report having the same false memories, leading to a belief that something is changing reality.
We all experience life through our own subjective lenses, interpreting day-to-day happenings differently than everyone else. This contributes to individuality, free will, and the ability to think for ourselves. But of course, the way that we witness our world often results in lapses of memory or perception. We sometimes seem to remember events happening differently than others or our perception of time is skewed.
And individual memory lapses are easily written off when everyone else’s memory says otherwise. But how does one explain false memories that are held by a significantly large portion of the population?
Confabulation is the psychiatric term for replacing a gap in your memory with a falsification. So, what about mass confabulation? Well, that’s become a conspiracy of sorts, referred to as The Mandela Effect.
Examples of The Mandela Effect
The Mandela Effect was given its name by Fiona Broome, who seemed to remember hearing about the death of Nelson Mandela on the news while he was imprisoned in the 1980s. In “reality,” Mandela survived until late 2013 and did not even become president of South Africa until 1994. But as it turned out, her memory was shared by a deluge of similarly convinced people, resulting in many other instances in which large swaths of the population have claimed to experience the same confabulated memories.
Could this be the result of one person incorrectly remembering a historical event or cultural icon propagating their misinterpretation to be inaccurately remembered by the masses? Or could it be evidence of a multiverse in which waves of events from a parallel universe have washed over into ours, creating subtle nuances in the time-space continuum, where there was once a children’s book called the Berenstein Bears, instead of the Berenstain Bears? It’s more interesting to explore the latter.
While the Berenstain Bears is ostensibly a mundane and inconsequential example of the Mandela Effect, there are other instances that are so uncanny, they’re hard to ignore. For example, when Darth Vader reveals his paternalistic relationship to Luke in Star Wars, most remember him saying, “Luke, I am your father.” In ‘reality,’ he says, “No, I am your father.” While an intransigent Star Wars fan might scoff at someone who misquotes such an important scene, it can’t be ignored that most people remember it in the former. Even James Earl Jones, who voiced Darth Vader, remembers the line incorrectly.
Movie quotes aside, an example of a famous real-life event that has been brought into the mystery of the Mandela Effect regards the famous protester at Tiananmen Square. The ‘Tank Man,’ whose defiant act of rebellion, standing in front of a tank with grocery bags in hand, is remembered by many as resulting in his death from being run over. In fact, he was not run over and there is no evidence of it, but many remember his crushing demise distinctly.
This is nothing new to those familiar with the theory and there are many other examples that support it; so many that there is an entire subreddit devoted to the effect. With topics ranging from movies that never existed to discrepancies in historical events, people vehemently claim to remember very particular things differently, but on a large, collective scale. Some people’s reactions are visceral when they experience new revelations due to the Mandela Effect, to the point of incurring panic attacks or questioning reality.
Mandela Effect Theories and CERN
One pragmatist theory for explaining the Mandela Effect is that it is simply a failure in the collective memory. Our brains are very easily influenced by our own filters, as well as the perception of others. Many common instances of the Mandela Effect are trivial and maybe just went unnoticed in the past, or are the result of conclusions that our brains jump to based on the context of an image or video. But some are substantial, like an entire country hundreds of miles out of place.
One of the more intriguing theories that attempt to explain this phenomenon points a finger at CERN and the large hadron collider in Switzerland. CERN’s experiments are intended to find elusive particles that could potentially show evidence of a multiverse, create tiny black holes, or discover dark matter. While all of this sounds very exciting, it also sounds potentially dangerous. What could possibly go wrong if we opened up a black hole in Europe, or tapped into another dimension with consequences unknown? While the scientists at CERN assure us their experiments are conducted on such a controlled, small scale as to have little, if any, negative consequences, some believe that their meddling in quantum fields has led to some strange effects, resulting in some kind of interdimensional entanglement.
One of the quantum particles that CERN has been searching for is the graviton. These elusive particles correspond with how gravity would react between different dimensions and are still only hypothetical, but the way CERN describes them is intriguing.
“If gravitons exist, it should be possible to create them at the LHC, but they would rapidly disappear into extra dimensions. Collisions in particle accelerators always create balanced events – just like fireworks – with particles flying out in all directions. A graviton might escape our detectors, leaving an empty zone that we notice as an imbalance in momentum and energy in the event. We would need to carefully study the properties of the missing object to work out whether it is a graviton escaping to another dimension or something else.”
Is CERN inducing these gravitons, creating holes to other dimensions, and swapping idiosyncrasies in our world? Or are we just having a collective memory lapse?